HELP   |   REGISTER   |   LOGIN
RSS
The Individual Investor Intelligence Network
HOME  |  GLOBAL MACRO  |  MEDIA  |  TECHNOLOGY  |  BIOTECH  |  COMMODITIES  |  EDUCATION  |  IU25 INDEX  |  ABOUT US

Yahoo Needs Direction, for Everyone's Sake

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
tokyogai
User Rank
Platinum
No clear direction
tokyogai   3/16/2012 8:39:32 AM
NO RATINGS
I think the management and board of Yahoo has really done a poor job in recent years. i see no signs of a clear direction or even business strtegy. They seem to be reacting to other companies rather than doing something themselves.

Joao-Pierre Ruth
User Rank
Iron
Re: No clear direction
Joao-Pierre Ruth   3/16/2012 9:05:50 AM
NO RATINGS
Have yet to see what their latest CEO has in store for the company but Summer made it clear that any plans could change AGAIN if this fight over Yahoo's board leads to a new slate of directors.

TechStockProspector
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No clear direction
TechStockProspector   3/16/2012 10:32:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Someone tweeted this week that Yahoo should sell its core business to Microsoft for $6 billion and then change its name to Asian Assets, Inc. Right now, the asian assets are the whole story for Yahoo.

The only thing the new Yahoo CEO has proven so far is he knows how to turn the company into a patent troll. I am all for Loeb's slate of directors (especially Jeff Zucker) getting in there and shaking things up. Yahoo has zero direction and has not shown one bit of improvement since Bartz was removed.

Dex
User Rank
Iron
Re: No clear direction
Dex   3/16/2012 11:05:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Jeff Zucker? Really? He ruined NBC, so what do you think he can do for Yahoo, @TechProspector?

TechStockProspector
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No clear direction
TechStockProspector   3/16/2012 11:13:13 AM
NO RATINGS
Zucker had success and failure at NBC. He wasn't perfect. But we're talking a board seat, not a direct management role. He knows the entertainment business and Yahoo needs to focus on content.

cat tail
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No clear direction
cat tail   3/16/2012 11:21:07 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm siding with Dex here on Zucker. Thompson's endorsement of him does not, to me, say much about Yahoo's future.

New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd once wrote that in Hollywood "there has been a single topic of discussion: How does Jeff Zucker keep rising and rising while the fortunes of NBC keep falling and falling? ...many in the Hollywood community have always regarded him as ...a network Napoleon who never bothered to learn about developing shows and managing talent." She explained that Zucker "is a master at managing up with bosses and calculating cost-per-hour benefits, but even though he made money on cable shows, he could not program the network to save his life."

Dowd also reported that an unnamed "honcho at another network" stated that "Zucker is a case study in the most destructive media executive ever to exist... You'd have to tell me who else has taken a once-great network and literally destroyed it."

Noreen Seebacher
User Rank
Blogger
Re: No clear direction
Noreen Seebacher   3/16/2012 11:36:30 AM
NO RATINGS
@Cattail, I have qualms about Zucker too. If Yahoo wants to focus on content, he's not the man. Remember when he thought his appearance on Kirstie Ally's short lived Fat Actress was a good idea?
Kirstie forces her agent to set up a meeting with Jeff Zucker who thinks she is too fat for television, but ends up with a holding deal after sleeping with the executive.

You can watch it here: http://www.imdb.com/video/amazon/vi3691945753/

But it's not pretty.

TechStockProspector
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No clear direction
TechStockProspector   3/16/2012 12:18:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Katie Couric must not think Zucker is so awful as he's exec producing her upcoming talk show.

I think we're missing the point here. Zucker would be just one board seat. Loeb is at least running names who will disrupt Yahoo's current business, which needs to be disrupted. But if there are better names, I am all for hearing them.

Phoenix
User Rank
Gold
Yahoo! What will happen?
Phoenix   3/16/2012 2:14:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Do you really think Yahoo's shares are actually worth $17? The lack of a clear strategy and direction sure makes it difficult to believe that the stock is underpriced. Specially when you take the risk factor into consideration. What do you think will happen with the facebook lawsuit? Will winning it make a big difference?

Joao-Pierre Ruth
User Rank
Iron
Re: Yahoo! What will happen?
Joao-Pierre Ruth   3/16/2012 2:33:43 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm not going propose a value for this stock. Rick Summer said Morningstar believes Yahoo is worth $17 but with the caveat about staying away for now unless you already invested in the company.

Yahoo previously tried to get some licensing fees from Facebook as it had done with some other companies. Without knowing how much money Yahoo wants from Facebook, it is difficult to say how much of a legal slugfest this is going to be.

Either way, the lawsuit does not answer Yahoo's central issue of figuring out a real core strategy. We need to see SOMETHING from Yahoo that declares why this company is still relevant.

Phoenix
User Rank
Gold
Re: Yahoo! What will happen?
Phoenix   3/17/2012 5:22:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes @ Joao-Pierre at the end of the day it is up to Yahoo to develop a good strategy to remain competitive as an organisation. @ value hiker You are absolutely right we are dealing with a headless chicken.

TelecomFreq
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Yahoo! What will happen?
TelecomFreq   3/16/2012 2:47:17 PM
NO RATINGS
When I was in high school Yahoo was the big dog on the internet block, and now it seems that they are just lost and do not know where to go. I feel like they need to do something different and really stick with it. Its just so hard to say what would work for them right now.

Value Hiker
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Yahoo! What will happen?
Value Hiker   3/16/2012 3:28:10 PM
NO RATINGS
These days Yahoo likes a headless chicken running around Internet playground, pecking anyone who made a splash.

TelecomFreq
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Yahoo! What will happen?
TelecomFreq   3/16/2012 3:53:18 PM
NO RATINGS
I have to think they have the minds and the talent there to chang things up and be innovative in some field they just need to make it happen. To me it really seems like they have lost focus.

Noreen Seebacher
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Yahoo! What will happen?
Noreen Seebacher   3/18/2012 12:06:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Ha! That's funny @Value Hiker

Noreen Seebacher
User Rank
Blogger
Innovation slump?
Noreen Seebacher   3/18/2012 12:06:14 AM
NO RATINGS
Prety interesting post on Yahoo here:
I get more and more annoyed with Yahoo. Yahoo wants to share the news stories I read on Facebook in an effort to gain more traffic. I accidently found out, and had to spend time figuring how to unsubscribe from the app. Annoying. Try reading one of your emails on Yahoo, and click the back button on your browser. You don't get return to your inbox, but to whatever page you were on before, often the login page; if you don't have your user name and password saved, you'll have to re-enter them. Joy.
The Yahoo financial message boards, king when I first got on the net, now a jumbled mess- a search for "Hewlett Packard" in stocks A-Z gave the following result. Sorry, we did not find results for "hewlett packard" ... So they still consider Yahoo a search engine? They'll consistently link incorrectly to columns I desire to read. Recently on Yahoo Finance, I got redirected to several "link not found" pages. To actually go the articles in question, I copied and pasted the title into the top of of my Chrome browser to find them on Google. (removing the extra step needed to go to google.com)


driven
User Rank
Iron
Re: Innovation slump?
driven   3/18/2012 12:22:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Pretty good article. I especially agree with this: Yahoo wants to share the news stories I read on Facebook in an effort to gain more traffic. I accidently found out, and had to spend time figuring how to unsubscribe from the app.

AskAsa
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Innovation slump?
AskAsa   3/18/2012 12:38:22 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree with the author of that article. Yahoo is my default spam email address.

Noreen Seebacher
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Innovation slump?
Noreen Seebacher   3/19/2012 8:40:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Did Yahoo get complacent? I mean everyone seems to acknowledge it was a big player at one point. Did it just get too cocky?

cat tail
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Innovation slump?
cat tail   3/19/2012 9:00:50 AM
NO RATINGS
How about the fact that it blew the proposed 2008 acquisition by Microsoft? One of the Dumbest business decisions I can recall.

Noreen Seebacher
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Innovation slump?
Noreen Seebacher   3/20/2012 7:59:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Well, yea, there was that...



The blogs and comments posted on Investor Uprising do not reflect the views of Investor Uprising, PRNewswire, or its sponsors. Investor Uprising, PRNewswire, and its sponsors do not assume responsibility for any comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.

More Blogs from Joćo-Pierre Ruth
Investors were lukewarm about the software and hardware updates that Apple launched at the Worldwide Developers Conference.
Sure, BlackBerry was as addictive as crack at one time. But now the CrackBerry is cracked.
HP is cutting 27,000 employees as part of a plan to be more nimble to innovate and compete.
Yahoo has finally divested some of its Alibaba stake, but investors don't seem that excited. Maybe it's because they want a solid CEO.
Winning in the video game wars is not easy, even for a mainstay such as EA.
IU Education
Resources to help you become a better investor
IU Education
Quick Poll
Investor Uprising on Twitter
Investor Uprising on Twiter
Market Chatter
Like Us on Facebook
25 market-moving companies we're tracking
PR Newswire's Terms of Use Apply | Privacy | Contact Us
Copyright © 1996-2013 PR Newswire Association LLC. All Rights Reserved.
A UBM plc company.
PR Newswire