HELP   |   REGISTER   |   LOGIN
RSS
The Individual Investor Intelligence Network
HOME  |  GLOBAL MACRO  |  MEDIA  |  TECHNOLOGY  |  BIOTECH  |  COMMODITIES  |  EDUCATION  |  IU25 INDEX  |  ABOUT US

Bumpy Road Ahead in Verizon Spectrum Fight

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
mInvestor
User Rank
Iron
Re: March Toward Monopoly
mInvestor   4/6/2012 10:57:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Don't think governement can run all mobile networks effectively. It will lead to more problems.

 

ProfR
User Rank
Platinum
Re: spectrum
ProfR   4/4/2012 11:50:17 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, I think getting companies to agree to build by a specific date or the spectrum goes back into the pool is a good idea.

TelecomFreq
User Rank
Platinum
Re: spectrum
TelecomFreq   4/3/2012 4:34:49 PM
NO RATINGS
The technology is there for different modulation rates that will allow more throughput on the specturm, but like you point out its expenssive, it basicly means that the provider would need to rebuild their whole RF network.

There is also the issue of legacy handsets that might not be able to work on newer modulations.

 

Joao-Pierre Ruth
User Rank
Iron
Re: spectrum
Joao-Pierre Ruth   4/3/2012 4:27:14 PM
NO RATINGS
This wireless spectrum issue is a strange reversal of some concerns raised when high-definition TV spectrum became available to broadcasters.

One of the concerns was that TV networks would subdivide their HD channels into multiple channels that would be less than full HD but still better than the old standard definition. In such a scenario you would have something like NBC-1, NBC-2, NBC-3, etc. all showing content in place of one unified NBC channel. That would have given the networks more ways to generate advertising revenue.

But for wireless, the providers are doing everything they can to avoid the expense of subdividing their spectrum and making more efficient use of it to meet demand.

It can be done but no one wants to pay the price of doing it.

TelecomFreq
User Rank
Platinum
Re: spectrum
TelecomFreq   4/3/2012 2:23:41 PM
NO RATINGS
@Scott,

I agree that spectrum hoarding is bad for everyone, I think the auctions for spectrum should come with stipulations that it has to be developed within a fixed number of months or else it goes back on the block and the company is out the cash it put up at auction. I just dont think the FCC has the balls for something like that.

tokyogai
User Rank
Platinum
Japan
tokyogai   4/3/2012 2:19:35 PM
NO RATINGS
In Japan they give spectrum out- but you have to promise to build a network with an agreed upon completion date to use it. This keeps the cost to the consumer low- as they are not repaying these huge hidden taxes and it does not allow companies to hoard. If the build is less than promised or late, the spectrum is given to someone else. In the event you are late, then huge fines come into play- almost like the FCC. It really seems to benefit the consumer.

Scott Raynovich
User Rank
Blogger
Re: spectrum
Scott Raynovich   4/3/2012 2:15:00 PM
NO RATINGS
@TelecomFreq

yes I guess that's what I'm saying people seem to be hoarding spectrum for the sake of hoarding spectrum just to squeeze others and make the price go up that is not a healthy business activity.

TelecomFreq
User Rank
Platinum
Re: March Toward Monopoly
TelecomFreq   4/3/2012 2:14:15 PM
NO RATINGS
@ProfR,

So do you think it is a better idea to have the government run all the specturm and mobile networks and then just lease out bandwidth instead of leasing out the spectrum itself?

Scott Raynovich
User Rank
Blogger
Re: March Toward Monopoly
Scott Raynovich   4/3/2012 2:14:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Agreed.

ProfR
User Rank
Platinum
Re: March Toward Monopoly
ProfR   4/3/2012 1:47:39 PM
NO RATINGS
The problem, Scott, is that infrastructure like networking is a natural oligopoly/monopoly. And that will continue to be the case. If we want a ubiquitous infrastructure that has sufficient bandwidth, this will continue to move in that direction.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


The blogs and comments posted on Investor Uprising do not reflect the views of Investor Uprising, PRNewswire, or its sponsors. Investor Uprising, PRNewswire, and its sponsors do not assume responsibility for any comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.

More Blogs from João-Pierre Ruth
Investors were lukewarm about the software and hardware updates that Apple launched at the Worldwide Developers Conference.
Sure, BlackBerry was as addictive as crack at one time. But now the CrackBerry is cracked.
HP is cutting 27,000 employees as part of a plan to be more nimble to innovate and compete.
Yahoo has finally divested some of its Alibaba stake, but investors don't seem that excited. Maybe it's because they want a solid CEO.
Winning in the video game wars is not easy, even for a mainstay such as EA.
IU Education
Resources to help you become a better investor
IU Education
Quick Poll
Investor Uprising on Twitter
Investor Uprising on Twiter
Market Chatter
Like Us on Facebook
25 market-moving companies we're tracking
PR Newswire's Terms of Use Apply | Privacy | Contact Us
Copyright © 1996-2013 PR Newswire Association LLC. All Rights Reserved.
A UBM plc company.
PR Newswire