Civilian employment as a percentage of the population bottomed out in December 2009 at 58.2%. By January 2012, that number had risen only to 58.5%. Unprecedented levels of government spending to get the economy back on track, and employment has risen all of 0.3 percentage points!
The number goes down because people drop out of the labor market, but the overall percentage basically remains the same. Very interesting and disturbing data.
I agree, but it also scares me. When the money supply growth stops getting sopped up y de-leveraging I expect to see inflation come on strong. If people then start to borrow again, it will be a double whammy.
You have done a great job of summing up our weird world of fianance and the dynamic of Keynesians vs. Austrians.
Here are the choices: Withstand resounding depression for a few years while the system entirely deleverages or fire up the money presses to inflate away the debt and risk hyperinflation.
'Personally, I'd rather deal with knowns: If we let the debt deflate, it will be painful for a while, but then at least we know we've cleansed the system.
If we try to paper over the system by creating more debt (both public and private), which we layer on top of the old debt... we are really creating and unknown of historical proportion.
Bernanke has really made a huge gamble in his legacy based on mostly theoretical academic investigations.. let's see what happens in the real world.
In the last few years, people have lost a lot of high-paying jobs. (Think manufacturing.) Many of them have either had to settle for lower-paying work (Think Retail) or have become frustrated enough to leave the job market altogether.And anytime a person's income drops, it takes a huge amount of discipline to ratchet the spending down enough to stay solvent.
So most were happy to use a home equity line to fill the gap and now it's time to pay the piper.Thanks for providing the data that shows the reality most of us see.
I'm wondering where the new policy of greater openness at the Fed will lead us. What if the economic indicators continue to be stronger than expected? What if employment really does rebound? The whole keep it at 0 interest rate strategy is predicated on a very weak economy through the end of 2014. Will the FOMC reverse course if the forecast proves wrong -- and will changing direction be worse than not knowing the future direction in the first place?
It seems to me that there will come a point when the FOMC will either have to change course or dig in its heels to insist it is right in spite of the data to the contrary. Either way, the committee looks like a bunch of idiots.
So if I make a decision -- say to get an ARM -- based on this promise of low rates for the next few years, and the FOMC later reverses its course, do you think I could whine and cry for a government subsidy to cover my higher mortgage costs?
do you think I could whine and cry for a government subsidy?
Absolutely. This is your right. I think it's just after "pursuit of happiness"?
Another inalienable right is the right to think that Congress is full of bozos. New Gallop poll says approval is down around 10%. Strangely, people tend to think more highly of their own senators and congressmen.
@Predictable, It makes me sad to recognize that we've become a nation of whiners. What happened to standing on your own two feet? What happened to work ethics?
I feel everything is clouded with greed and desire, and when those dreams are shattered, rather than pick themselves up and start over, a whole segment of the population just sits down and cries for help.
Maybe our own generosity has contributed to this problem by making it easier on under-achievers. Check out this article at ZeroHedge which compares the disposable income of two families - one solidly middle class with a $60,000 annual income, and the other supported by a single, minimum wage job.
Because of US tax policy and welfare programs, the minimum wage worker ends up with more money to spend. Not exactly a good way to encourage hard work.
I saw this first hand when I was recruiting for some modest paying jobs ($14 to $18 an hr) a few years ago. Based on the benefits some people were receiving (medical, housing subsidies, public assistance/unemployment, lower rate nat gas and electric bills, SNAP [food stamps], etc). they would turn down the job because they "made" more doing nothing.
If working pays less than not working, it is a sad and sorry situation. Money is not the only benefit of work, even entry-level jobs teach skills that can start people on a growth path. But welfare doesn't.
In all the conversation about the various economic classes, I've noticed that the upper class - the 1% - is quite fluid. People enter,Iike Steve Jobs, even with less privleged backgrounds. And they also drop out - due to business failures, bad investments, even bankruptcy.
The lowest class isn't as mobile - people tend to stay there. Maybe economic incentives to turn down work are part of the reason.
I agree completely. On one hand, I fully understand the desperation some people feel because they are unable to find a job. However, at some point, the safety net has to break, or unemployment just becomes another form of welfare. The longer someone stays on unemployment, the less self confidence and sense of self worth he has. And that's sad to see, don't you think?
The longer someone stays on unemployment, the less self confidence and sense of self worth he has.
@Noreen, I totally agree with your observation. I think the best way to tackle this situation is to attend some training courses which can add value to the existing skill sets. Thus the person can keep himself busy and not loose his self confidence.
According to the Census Bureau, median household income peaked in 1999 at $53,252 (in 2010 dollars).
@Lenore, its pretty scary to see that the household median has fallen by 7.2%. I am curious to know if the new household median of $49445 is after adjusting for inflation ?
Excellent analysis, can't think of anything else to add to this topic.
Just for more fun, could you provide the source on household median income and debt to income ratio? It will be interesting to see how those numbers were calculated (it probably tells more about ecomony trend in the last several years).
It is true people really do define themselves by their ability to get employment and being unemployed increases the financial and emotional burden I have often wondered if unemployment checks school come with some behavioral modification training to offset the depression and lack of self confidence so many unemployed experience.
i always thought unemployment checks were like carrots on sticks: I assumed you actually had to do something (like look for work) to get them. In fact, it's easy to beat the system.
One more thing about unemployment. In NYS, recipients are automatically eligible for SNAP (food stamps), without regard to assets or investments. So someone with massive investments and a multi-million dollar house is still eligble for government aid to buy food, as long as those assets are not liquid.
Noreen that really is shameful as I walk through New York I increasingly see more and more homeless people and to provide benefits to the wealthy while people are living on the streets is reprehensible. The unemployment system is little more than a stipend for many to get them through but it can be helpful to offset job hunting expenses and day to day expenses.
Right, well, I realize that sounds too callous. Maybe I was being too flippant. I realize that a lot of people need it. I went off umemployment and started doing consulting/freelancing, but eventually I went back to find a W-2.
The politicians all want to make employment seem simple and neat for their soundbits (Taxes! China! Interest rates!). The reality is that it's far more complex.
But here's a question I've always had: What's with the German economy? They have demographic problems, they have huge government programs, they are surrounded by European issues, but their economy is always decent. Maybe it's just cause they make good stuff.
Of course we have Apple -- if you ignore the slaves in FoxConn.
The German question is a fantastic one and goes straight to the heart of the entire EU situation.The euro zone problem is not, contrary to what many a bureaucrat claims, entirely an issue of profligate nations vs those saintly Teutonic nations.Granted their spending habits play a role, but it isn't the root of the problem.Greece, Portugal, Spain etc have artificially strong currencies because of their affiliation with Germany.During the good times, they had artificially low sovereign bond yields, which contributed to their more profligate nature.Germany, on the other hand, has benefited greatly from having artificially LOW exchange rates.Ta Da!Strong exports thus great employment.Add to that Germany, oh and they'll never admit this, enjoys artificially low yields as well.How's that?Because the trade of the post-Lehman crisis is to short the profligates and go LONG the German bonds, thus artificially driving demand for their bonds up, thus lowering yields.
Scott I see your point but for those that don't generally earn significant salaries the $405 a week is a big deal. There are many in NJ that still exist on minimum wage and they are not students.
The blogs and comments posted on Investor Uprising do not reflect the views of Investor Uprising, PRNewswire, or its sponsors. Investor Uprising, PRNewswire, and its sponsors do not assume responsibility for any comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
Forget about business growth as long as the future of tax rates remains unclear, regulation continues to expand in unpredictable ways, and legislation keeps creating increasingly onerous burdens.
To save this item to your list of favorite Investor Uprising content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.