"The check is in the mail" isn't a Facebook post (Nasdaq: FB) or Groupon deal (Nasdaq: GRPN) that investors have been hearing lately, and with Facebook shares trading down 53% from their initial offering price and Groupon sliding from $31 to $4, they might not want to hold their breath.
The McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), the business and economics think tank arm of privately held consulting giant McKinsey and Company, doesn't appear to have gotten that status update, however. In a breathtakingly bullish report issued in late July, MGI "estimate[s] that between $900 billion and $1.3 trillion in value can be unlocked through the use of social technologies in the sectors we examined." A discrepancy that would facilitate the throughput of a truck, as the consultants might say.
The Potential of Social Media
Companies have an opportunity to raise the productivity of employees including managers and professionals by 20% to 25%.
To understand whether McKinsey's exuberant optimism could best be categorized as irrational or insightful, I read all the way through the 184-page report, the research for which was entirely underwritten by McKinsey partners without relying on a dime of vested-interest industry funding. I had three agendas other than watching my black printer cartridge fade to 50 shades of gray:
As someone whose day job involves consulting in the social media field, I really, truly wanted to absorb the strategic, global perspective of the report's findings.
I wanted to understand how McKinsey would address the profound gap between its positive assessment of industry potential and the disappointing stock performance we've seen for social media stocks so far.
Most important, I was looking for useful investment direction, including any social media trends or new business models that would appear to be bright spots in an industry whose promises of ROI have been, shall we say, inflated?
I came away impressed on all three scores. The report combines analysis of social media in the abstract with absorbing mini-case-studies of groundbreaking real-life social media success stories to identify, not only social media trends so far, but what to look for as the industry matures. If you have two hours and want to get 75% of the value of a marketing MBA for free without leaving home, read this report. Then, if you have two more hours, read it again.
The first thing you'll come to understand is why Facebook has been such an investor disappointment and why still-private companies such as Pinterest should be approached with caution. It isn't because they've missed the boat on mobile apps or failed to target their advertising: It's because they are technology-driven rather than consumer needs-driven.
They're like the sword-brandishing Bedouin in Raiders of the Lost Ark, full of impressive visual moves but powerless when Indiana Jones simply takes out his pistol and fells him with a single shot. The takeaway here? The marketplace is so easily bedazzled by new technology that it postpones asking the most important question until the novelty wears off: Once the whiz-bang factor has run its course, will a social media application or platform enrich and improve people's daily lives?
So, the McKinsey study takes a different tack, by moving its recommendations away from specific companies or technology platforms to identify broad future sources of social media value. This reasoning leads to a "Top 10 List" of social media strengths:
User co-creation of new products
Demand forecasting
Distributed business processes
Market research and consumer insight
Marketing communication and interaction
Lead generation
Social commerce
Customer care
Collaborative communication
Sourcing talent within an organization and matching it to roles
And what industries are positioned to become what McKinsey calls "Enterprise 2.0" and uniquely profit from social media technology and marketing leadership? There are five:
Consumer packaged goods, not only in terms of product development but user community development and social shopping as well. A prime example of this is Kraft's creation of the South Beach Diet community.
Consumer financial services, in many different ways including networked support (Farmers Insurance agents), novel products (Friendsurance, a German company, which allows groups to save money by applying for insurance together), internal social networks (TD Bank), and community assistance (American Express Open small business network).
Advanced manufacturing, particularly insemiconductors, automotive, and aerospace. Intel, a leader in predicting demand via social interactions, the social launch of the Ford Fiesta, and Local Motors' crowdsourced creation of a combat-ready vehicle in five weeks make for riveting case study reading.
Social sector, including not-for-profits and NGOs. Here the social and financial impact is potentially huge, including using social media to predict social unrest, creation of ground crisis-mapping software, crowdsourcing the provision and mobilization of resources, and support of mission through fundraising.
Social technology providers, the most important of which is social media as a source and analytical tool for big-data. For example, use of Twitter to assess public moods has already improved the accuracy of one DJIA stock market predictive model from 46.7% to 86.7%.
The McKinsey report doesn't remove the uncertainty from social media investing but it provides a lot of clarity. It reminded me that no matter what bells and whistles technology may attach to the value proposition, there will never be a substitute for meeting consumer demand. If you build it just to build it, they might not come.
Garbage like this happens routinely;whenThere is way too much Cheap Money in the Financial System.
This is what Investors and Backers (of VCs ) think.
We are anyways getting ZERO percent in the Bank or in CDs,why not take a risk on some of it and see if we get any return on it?
This garbage would never happen in a world where Interest Rates were above the Real rate of Inflation(as it was always the case during the Gold Standard) or even during the times of 1980s;when Paul Volcker was in full Flow.
Its a Joke,what kind of a Central Banker we have in place in the Federal Reserve today.
And the Jokes on us(all of us) that we tolerate his nonsense.
From the article I really like this comment-Nothing explains the idiocy of Silicon Valley anymore than this statement;
"
They're making a million bucks a year without generating much, if any, return. It's like watching Fox News — these people are living in an alternate reality."
@back2basicz, great article in the NY Times today about how venture capitalists pretend they're saving the world when all they're really doing is getting rich.
I dare you to stay calmly seated while you're reading it!
@Ashish, if you let them raise your blood pressure one iota, they have won!
But seriously, what firms like Andreesen Horowitz do is one part financial, three parts marketing in my opinion.
Of course they're not going to publicly criticize their own deals, but they'd make a lot more points with me if they showed a willingness to work with Facebook to address the problems rather than saying, "Problems? What problems?"
Starting with the Chairman of the Banksters[Ben Bernanke] downwards;everyone is engaged in a Ponzi scheme today.
I really like what Ron Paul [The only guy in Congress who makes any sense today]said in his interview yesterday on open-ended QE3.
http://bloom.bg/RN9NHn
Marc Faber is on the Ball once again as usual.Its about time people dumped the US Dollar and moved to an alternative Reserve Currency.We all should be worried,Very,very worried.
The thing had me the most in splits was this statement-
"
About incentivizing employees:
Both new people coming into the company and people at the company get shares--so if they're undervalued today, they will be worth more in the future. "It's a great time for people to stay and double down." (Tepid applause from the audience.)
"
I have lost track of the number of Ponzi schemes which have paraded that piece of nonsense for ages and ages.As for employees,I am extremely confident more and more of them will take all their compensation in Cash-Zuck can keep the Shares...
Zuckerbeg thinks most Investors were born yesterday!!!
Great catch, @Ashish! Made my day! But, MZ wants you to know, HE'S NOT DOING THE PHONE!!!
This WSJ take on the conference make Zuck sound very, VERY nervous. My favorite part is at 5:09. Who's interviewing whom?
Zynga? Instagram? All brilliant moves! But only because HE'S NOT DOING THE PHONE!
I'm sticking to value investing and dividends right along with you, Ashish. Because even if Zuck WERE DOING THE PHONE, he wouldn't be getting any calls from Omaha!
Buy Companies with a solid History of paying Growing and Reliable Dividends.Not some stock which gets propelled upwards only by Funny Money(after losing more than half its market cap in less than a year)!!!
The blogs and comments posted on Investor Uprising do not reflect the views of Investor Uprising, PRNewswire, or its sponsors. Investor Uprising, PRNewswire, and its sponsors do not assume responsibility for any comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
To save this item to your list of favorite Investor Uprising content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.