HELP   |   REGISTER   |   LOGIN
RSS
The Individual Investor Intelligence Network
HOME  |  GLOBAL MACRO  |  MEDIA  |  TECHNOLOGY  |  BIOTECH  |  COMMODITIES  |  EDUCATION  |  IU25 INDEX  |  ABOUT US
Comments
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 4   >   >>
PredictableChaos
User Rank
Platinum
Re: ONLY $1.5 Trillion
PredictableChaos   12/8/2011 2:03:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Amazing charts, Noreen.  Yes, this what I was asking for and here's what it shows me -
  1. Unbelievable growth of debt in both charts.  Why do we need to borrow almost twice what we owed in 2002?
  2. Some tapering down recently, which is probably sane.
  3. A way to evaluate the magnitude of $1.5T, which was the original aim:

See if you can follow this - total outstanding loans of our commercial banks is about $7,000B or $7T.  US banks leverage 9 to 1, let's use 10 to 1 for simplicity; which requires a minimum of $700B of liquid assets at any given time.  $700B is about HALF of the $1.5T that the Fed finds they have to provide in overnight loans.  Doesn't this mean the ENTIRE banking system is basically worthless?  I expected to find that the amount of overnight loans was smaller than the total capital required, because the banks would have some of their own money, right?  Guys/Gals please tell me where I'm missing something.

Value Hiker
User Rank
Platinum
Re: ONLY $1.5 Trillion
Value Hiker   12/8/2011 12:40:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Chaos, the total US mortgage debt is around 13-14 trillions.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/releases/mortoutstand/current.htm

Value Hiker
User Rank
Platinum
Re: ONLY $1.5 Trillion
Value Hiker   12/8/2011 12:30:19 AM
NO RATINGS
Scott. it is true that many of the mortgage finally ends with either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, both only at secondary Market. Consumers do not have the choice to get the mortgage directly from these GSEs. 

I think that Fed shall let the consumers borrow directly from the GSEs, otherwise  just dissolve these GSEs all together

Noreen Seebacher
User Rank
Blogger
Re: ONLY $1.5 Trillion
Noreen Seebacher   12/7/2011 11:36:31 PM
NO RATINGS
And this is a little more comprehensive:



Noreen Seebacher
User Rank
Blogger
Re: ONLY $1.5 Trillion
Noreen Seebacher   12/7/2011 11:30:09 PM
NO RATINGS
@Predictable, is this what you were looking for? Fed data indicates there are $3485.4 billion in outstanding real estate loans at commercial banks.



PredictableChaos
User Rank
Platinum
Re: ONLY $1.5 Trillion
PredictableChaos   12/7/2011 8:19:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Value Hiker - I stand corrected on the per-person amount of the "secret" Fed loans. It's about $4,000.  Thanks

Scott - My loan is funded by Freddie Mac.  I only know this because of a link that Noreen had at the bottom of an article about refinance initiatives.

Knowing that my bank only services my loan, means they have that much less reason to need over-night money from the Fed.  And knowing that most loans (is it really most?) are like that, should mean the same for all the other banks.

Thinking about this brings to mind a question - What is the sum of all mortgage debt actually owned by US banks? 

Now, we know that banks have business loans and car loans, etc. so mortages aren't the total picture.  Still, answering this question will help me wrap my mind aournd the size of the $1.2 to $1.5 Billion.

Scott Raynovich
User Rank
Blogger
Re: ONLY $1.5 Trillion
Scott Raynovich   12/7/2011 5:55:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Value Hiker,

Most Americans did get a loan from the Feds ... it's called Fannie Mae.

Value Hiker
User Rank
Platinum
Re: ONLY $1.5 Trillion
Value Hiker   12/7/2011 5:48:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I think it is about $4k per headcount for 1.5T. If the loan was 7.7T, it means that each American loaned $20k to these banks, for a family of five, the total amount is $100k. The average mortgage amount for American family is about $170k, maybe all US taxpayers can get a mortgage from Fed for themself, instead from these banks.

Scott Raynovich
User Rank
Blogger
Re: The Letter
Scott Raynovich   12/7/2011 1:14:55 PM
NO RATINGS
LOL!

AskAsa
User Rank
Platinum
Re: The Letter
AskAsa   12/7/2011 12:57:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Reading Bloomberg's point by point rebuttal to the letter gives me a headache. I feel like I'm trapped in an argument on a playground.

<<   <   Page 2 / 4   >   >>




The blogs and comments posted on Investor Uprising do not reflect the views of Investor Uprising, PRNewswire, or its sponsors. Investor Uprising, PRNewswire, and its sponsors do not assume responsibility for any comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.

Latest Blogs
Telecom-equipment maker Ciena is a stock trader’s dream, as long as the timing is correct.
The FTC is offering a $50,000 cash prize to the person or group that can come up with a solution to those annoying robocalls.
Akamai is in the middle of four significant tech trends.
John Malone of Liberty Media will be taking over Sirius XM satellite radio when the existing CEO Mel Karmazin steps down. What's it mean?
Demand for students of the humanities exists, despite widespread aspersions on the discipline.
IU Education
Resources to help you become a better investor
IU Education
Quick Poll
Investor Uprising on Twitter
Investor Uprising on Twiter
Market Chatter
Like Us on Facebook
25 market-moving companies we're tracking
PR Newswire's Terms of Use Apply | Privacy | Contact Us
Copyright © 1996-2013 PR Newswire Association LLC. All Rights Reserved.
A UBM plc company.
PR Newswire