When I was reading the original post, I decided to research the concept of a "vote of no-confidence" which allows the UK to change its government more frequently than every four years.
I'm mixed on the results and would love other's opinions. The good news is that a disfunctional government gets put out of its misery sooner. The bad news is that the legislature, in that case Parliament, holds all the power.
The idea of our Congress controlling the executive branch is pretty scary. Not sure what the lesser of the evils is in this case.
Re: Electoral College
Ed Leefeldt
6/11/2012 11:07:11 AM
Perhaps someone can explain the Supreme Court's "Citizens United" decision, that makes the Super PACs all powerful and makes money even more powerful than votes. Influential groups like the NRA pushed for this.
The more I learned about the Electoral college the more depressed I felt about our alleged democracy. (ok democratic republic...)
I always found the Electoral college to be a mystery.... until Bush v. Gore in 2000.
Remember that Circus? There will be close elections again. Just like 2000, one state or even a fraction of a state will be under a microscope.
And this local fiasco is so much better than nationwide chaos.
PC
Re: Swing State Spending
Dex
6/11/2012 10:54:34 AM
I never understood why political groups got a pass on the do not call list. They are the ones I want to hear from the least.
Re: Swing State Spending
AskAsa
6/11/2012 10:45:58 AM
The other thing that's annoying is that political groups are exempt from a lot of consumer laws, like robocalls and provisions of the do not call lists.,
Re: Swing State Spending
AskAsa
6/11/2012 10:44:42 AM
They call them sucker lists for a reason, don't they?
Re: Swing State Spending
Ed Leefeldt
6/11/2012 10:41:32 AM
Blame the electoral college for that one. Politicians talk about getting rid of this anachronism, but it never happens, because it allows them to get the most bang for their economic buck.
Re: Swing State Spending
Ed Leefeldt
6/11/2012 10:39:52 AM
I agree. Once on a mailing list - anybody's mailing list - you never escape. Often your name and address are "regifted" to everyone else in the same business. Charities are frequent offenders.
Re: Swing State Spending
driven
6/11/2012 10:28:40 AM
During the last presidential election I made a $10 contribution to the Obama campaign simply because I was curious about the use of social media and wanted to get the text alerts, etc. Well, four years later I am still trying to purge my name from the mailing lists. Once a donor, you are always viewed as a sucker.
The blogs and comments posted on Investor Uprising do not reflect the views of Investor Uprising, PRNewswire, or its sponsors. Investor Uprising, PRNewswire, and its sponsors do not assume responsibility for any comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
Tweet This